Governance & Ethics

    ESG Invest – Code of Conduct

    Code of conduct for ESG ratings and data products providers — Aligned with the ICMA Voluntary Code of Conduct

    1Background

    Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) considerations increasingly influence how financial markets evaluate risk, allocate capital and judge long-term corporate resilience. ESG Invest produces ESG ratings, research and data used by investors, issuers, regulators and other stakeholders seeking to understand sustainability performance and exposure. Because these outputs contribute to decision-making, expectations for analytical rigour, independence, transparency and governance are high. This Code responds to those expectations and reflects our commitment to responsible conduct.

    2Introduction

    This Code explains the principles and practices that guide how ESG Invest develops, maintains and communicates its ESG ratings and data products. It sets out the governance architecture behind these activities, the safeguards protecting independence, the way methodology integrity is upheld and the manner in which ESG Invest engages with companies it rates. The purpose is to make our approach visible to the users of our outputs and to demonstrate our commitment to responsible conduct.

    3Development and Adoption of the Code

    The Code reflects global regulatory developments but also builds on ESG Invest's own history. The organisation formalised its conflict-of-interest framework in 2014 as the ratings arm of Sustainability Excellence. Today, ESG Invest still functions as an independent ratings and data business, while Sustainability Excellence provides consulting and sustainable finance advisory services. This Code reinforces that separation and strengthens the systems used by ESG Invest to align with international standards, including the ICMA Voluntary Code of Conduct for ESG Ratings and Data Products Providers.

    4Scope and Definitions

    The Code applies to all activities undertaken by ESG Invest that result in analytical opinions, ratings, datasets or research relating to ESG risk, performance or preparedness. These activities include the production of ESG ratings and scores, structured datasets, controversy analysis and thematic research. The Code does not govern consulting or sustainable finance advisory services, which remain entirely within Sustainability Excellence's remit and operate under separate governance arrangements.

    An ESG rating or score is a structured analytical view derived from a defined methodology. An ESG data product represents standardised information reflecting ESG attributes, characteristics or risks.

    5Principles of the Code

    5.1 Good Governance

    ESG Invest maintains governance structures that support consistent application of this Code. Responsibilities for methodology oversight, analytical execution, data controls and rating approval are clearly assigned. These processes are supported by compliance, risk management and Board-level supervision. Importantly, ESG Invest operates independently from Sustainability Excellence's consulting activities. This independence is reflected in separate management teams, information systems, remuneration structures and decision-making processes.

    5.2 Securing Quality through Systems and Controls

    ESG Invest applies written procedures and review mechanisms to safeguard analytical quality. Ratings and research are grounded primarily in publicly disclosed information, reflecting traceability and equal treatment. Analysts follow documented methodologies that are applied systematically and reviewed periodically. Prior to publication, outputs undergo internal quality assurance checks that validate evidential coherence and interpretation. Analysts receive professional training to ensure consistent methodology application and are supported by ongoing learning frameworks.

    5.3 Managing Conflicts of Interest

    Independence is the foundation of ESG Invest's credibility and analytical integrity. The organisation operates structured systems to identify, prevent, manage and disclose any circumstance that could compromise impartiality. This Code embeds our long-standing conflict management framework first formalised in 2014, which continues to shape the ethical expectations applied to all analysts and decision-makers.

    The principles underpinning that framework remain central today. Analysts are expected to conduct their work with objectivity by interpreting evidence solely through established methodological requirements; neutrality by resisting any form of external inducement, pressure or influence; equality by applying identical analytical treatment to all entities irrespective of location, profile, stakeholder relationship or client status; and confidentiality by safeguarding any non-public or commercially sensitive information obtained during the analytical process.

    Analytical judgement must remain free from commercial, relational or personal bias. Personal beliefs, preferences or affiliations must never interfere with scoring or interpretation. Analysts are prohibited from working on any assessment where a real or perceived conflict exists — including situations involving financial interests in a rated entity, recent employment or business relationships with that entity, or close family links to its management or staff. Where such situations arise, they must be disclosed immediately and the analyst must be recused from the relevant work.

    Similarly, gifts, hospitality or in-kind benefits from organisations covered by ESG Invest's work are either refused outright or reported formally to management. Any personal ties or circumstances that could reasonably give rise to a perceived or actual conflict must be disclosed to senior leadership so that appropriate safeguards can be enacted.

    To reinforce independence, ESG Invest does not link analyst remuneration to the commercial performance of rated entities or to any commercial outcomes arising from ratings activity.

    5.4 Transparency

    ESG Invest is committed to explaining the basis and meaning of its ratings and data products. Methodology architecture, scoring principles, data use hierarchy, treatment of limited disclosure and interpretation of rating outcomes are explained in rating reports and supporting materials. While proprietary calibration remains confidential to protect intellectual property, stakeholders are enabled to understand how results were reached and how methodologies may evolve. Significant methodology changes are communicated in advance to give affected stakeholders time to understand potential impacts.

    5.5 Confidentiality

    ESG Invest protects non-public information shared during engagement with assessed entities. Confidential materials are used solely for analytical purposes, stored securely and accessed only by authorised personnel. These protections are embedded in internal processes, reinforced through contractual terms and supported by staff training.

    5.6 Engagement with Covered Entities

    ESG Invest engages with rated companies in a structured, fair and independent manner. After completion of an assessment, each company receives a complimentary copy of its ESG Rating Report. This allows visibility into the factors contributing to the rating and highlights disclosure strengths and gaps. Because our assessments rely exclusively on publicly available information, issuance of a draft report enables companies to review factual content. A reasonable review period is provided for companies to verify factual accuracy.

    ESG Invest welcomes factual clarification because it strengthens analytical accuracy. Verified factual corrections are incorporated into rating files through a documented quality assurance process. Engagement does not include negotiation of scores or reconsideration of methodology application. The accuracy review mechanism functions as a validation step without influencing analytical judgment or overriding the application of scoring criteria. Issuer engagement is governed by transparency and equal treatment.

    6Methodology Transparency and Use of Public Information

    ESG Invest applies methodologies that are described and explained through our intuitive rating reports. These documents outline themes assessed, criteria applied, evidence expectations, weighting logic and treatment of missing information. Assessments are derived exclusively from publicly available data to preserve traceability, equal treatment and objectivity. This approach ensures that ratings can be understood, reproduced conceptually and validated against a visible evidence base.

    Companies are encouraged to use their rating reports to identify disclosure gaps and improve transparency. By issuing reports to rated entities and allowing a review period, ESG Invest contributes to higher reporting quality over time while maintaining full independence over scoring outcomes.

    7Analyst Training, Conduct and Attestation

    ESG Invest requires that all analysts, researchers and personnel involved in the development or issuance of ESG ratings read, understand and sign this Code of Conduct upon joining the organisation and at least annually thereafter. Signing the Code signifies commitment to its principles, acknowledgement of related obligations and acceptance of personal accountability for compliance.

    Mandatory training is provided on the Code, conflict-of-interest rules, confidentiality requirements, methodology discipline and engagement protocols. Training is refreshed periodically and whenever material changes occur.

    8Annual Review and Statement of Application

    ESG Invest reviews this Code annually to ensure continued alignment with global standards and evolving market expectations. An Annual Statement of Application is published explaining how the Code has been implemented, what enhancements have been made and the direction of further improvement. This supports public accountability and visibility of governance practices.

    9Public Commitment

    By publishing this Code, ESG Invest affirms its commitment to responsible conduct in issuing ESG ratings and data products. The organisation recognises the role it plays in shaping market understanding of sustainability and undertakes to uphold independence, quality, transparency, confidentiality and fair engagement. The Code operates alongside ESG Invest's Conflict of Interest Policy – signed annually by our ESG analysts team, Methodology Framework, Confidentiality Policy and Engagement Protocol, forming an integrated governance framework.